Clean air charge could fund cycling

Without Government-backing for pollution fees, clean air zones could fail, campaigners say. And could cycling gain from such clean air zones? We spoke to Cycling UK and Sustrans to find out more…

By Cath Harris


Clean air zones that charge a ‘toxin tax’ could raise new funds for cycling, say campaigners.

But Government reluctance to back pollution penalties is ‘illogical’ and ‘disappointing’, and could mean the initiative fails, they add.

Instead, Cycling UK and Sustrans advocate charging initiatives that cover zone costs and generate a surplus, ring-fenced for investment in other transport.

Roger Geffen, Cycling UK’s Policy Director, says: ‘We need a charging mechanism that doesn’t leave local authorities to justify it.’

The call comes after the Government published its Clean Air Zone Framework earlier this month in response to a High Court order.

The hearing, in which law firm ClientEarth took ministers to court over illegally high pollution levels, was the third the Government had lost on this issue.

In the framework, ministers suggest creating low-pollution zones without penalties for those driving high-emission vehicles and shift responsibility for charging onto councils.

Geffen says: ‘The Government should expect [charging] rather than expect local authorities to avoid it.

‘The question then is “what do revenues get used for?”. That’s where there are opportunities for cycling and sustainable transport more generally.’

>> Bike-To-Work success spans Europe <<


Rachel White, Senior Policy and Political Advisor of the walking and cycling charity Sustrans agrees.

She says the framework’s support for cycling and walking is ‘encouraging’ but that measures to make cycling and walking safe, viable alternatives to car travel need Government funding.

commuter 2

‘The draft air quality plan disappointingly stops short of giving specific guidance to local authorities on how any revenue surplus generated from clean air zones should be reinvested back into cycling and walking infrastructure and projects, simply saying it “could cover public health projects or better town and city planning”,’ she adds.

The two groups would also back a scrappage scheme that offered incentives to ditch old diesel vehicles in favour of cleaner transport.

Subscriptions to hire bike schemes or funds to buy an e-bike are examples of ways in which cycling could be included.

The re-launch of the Evans Cycles bike trade-in scheme after five successive years, proves that new-bike incentives are popular.

In line with that, Cycling UK and Sustrans want more of the Government’s road building budget to be set-aside for cycling.

>> The best commuter bikes <<


New metro mayors, notably those in Greater Manchester and the West Midlands, are committed to encouraging cycling, Geffen says.

But the contribution of central government to investment in cycling will soon drop from £2 per head per year to 80p, just as roads spending soars.

White says:

We need more funding to go to our local road network which makes up 97 % of roads in England and to re-balance it away from the majority going on the strategic road network which only makes up 3 % of our roads.

Greater investment would give people the skills and confidence to cycle regularly and would in turn improve air quality and health.

Early last year, a report by the Royal College of Physicians and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health warned that outdoor pollution, mostly from vehicles, was causing at least 40,000 UK deaths annually.

Unborn and young children were particularly at risk with heart, lung and brain development defects lasting ‘far into the future’.

The report called for tough regulations to limit air pollution.


Cath Harris is a freelance writer and proofreader specialising in cycling, environment and adventure travel. Read her work at


>> Evans Cycles, Recycle Your Cycle and Hospice UK; it’s a win-win-win situation for Trade-In <<





Dave 1/06/2017

Bike to work and Diesel scrapage schemes miss the mark.
The Diesel scrap scheme is likely to turn into a: scrap a banger in order to buy a new car, exercise. The thing is, people who own a banger are usually nowhere near buying a brand new car, so only the rich will benefit. nice.
Bike to work depends on getting your bike somewhere near where you work. Public transport is not at all geared to transport bikes. The fold ups are “tolerated”. Real bikes are just not allowed during the rush hour. Even during the off peak you are lucky if you can get a bike on a (still overcrowded) train.
If cities worked on park and cycle schemes with drop-off points 5 -10 miles out you would have a chance, but no one is talking about it

keith 2/06/2017

All true in the blog by Dave- scrap a diesel car will be aimed at the well off only, what we need is a scrap a old polluting diesel car and a payment to help you buy a newer better less polluting engine car !!!
There are thousands maybe tens of thousands of used cars very new just sitting on car dealers forecourts we need to use these vehicles before we build more very expensive new cars which not all of us can afford!!
Public transport with a bike is a joke and not a funny one !- and bike to work sounds good but does not have the infrastructure to work even folding bikes are regarded as a nuisance and a real bike well just forget it!!!! one wonders if ‘Cross Rail’ have thought about this problem I doubt it very much- if there is no REAL provision on this Elizabeth Line for bikes that will prove the real attitude to ‘bike to work’ by Government and Local Authorities.

wayne 2/06/2017

Pollution. We are all responsible. Every one of us creates pollution, but another tax, we don’t want, and cant afford. If some road building schemes were geared some way towards the cyclist, then some of the pollution would not be there anyway. As this would encourage,I hope, more people to cycle. In the city where I live, yes the roads are busy, but there are also alot if people cycling now. Alot more than there was a couple of years ago, and this needs to be encouraged in every town and city. How many people reading this own a least one car? Let alone those that have more than one, who cant complain about the problems of pollution or traffic as they are making the problem worse than it needs to be, and they should stop moaning. Think about how many car journeys you make, could you make one or two less? It all helps to readdress the balance slightly. Also, the less you use your car, that’s less fuel you are buying, and so less tax for the government. Result.


Leave a reply

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *